Tuesday, May 15, 2018

Shane Macallan Julie Ali you are confusing subsidies with cleanup costs, which you are further conflating into one problem by confusing oilsands mining reclamation with conventional oil well reclamation. For example, the oil and gas industry do not get subsidies, they get incentives, which are offered to all companies regardless of their product. Bombardier gets whatever you call that thing. Wind and solar get subsidies, without which they could not exist. As far as reclamation goes, conventional oil has an established fund which is financed by present companies when they enter the market. Since they have a gazillion orphaned wells to reclaim, most of them historic bankruptcies, they have big money problems. On the other hand these problems get constant attention from the media and although it may seem like little progress is made in fact steady regular clean up occurs all the time. Oil sands mining is entirely different, since reclamation is mandatory, by law, and the companies are responsible for their own reclamation. Mining itself occurs only in about 1% of the total oilsands area because the oil is too deep to mine in the rest of the area. The rest extracts oil through processes like in situ SAGD operations which scarcely disturb the surface at all. There is one, and only one, mining op that has entered the public cleanup arena, due to a mine that failed before it even got started, and the conventional cleanup authority says it can handle this particular case without problem. 4 Manage Like · Reply · 31m · Edited


On the subject of climate change, Branson said he could relate to Alberta’s energy decision-makers who are grappling with how to do what’s best for the industry without hurting the environment.
At a time when Alberta’s energy industry is facing significant challenges, British billionaire Sir Richard Branson says innovation, entrepreneurial spirit and a social...
CALGARYHERALD.COM
LikeShow more reactions
Comment
1 Comment
Comments
Julie Ali Maybe also encourage the oil and gas industry to take care of it's own liabilities without taxpayer subsidy.
Manage
Reply1h
Bill Watson What liabilities and taxpayer subsidy?
Manage
Reply52m
Image may contain: outdoor, water and nature
THEGLOBEANDMAIL.COM
Estimated cleanup costs for Alberta’s mines jumps to $23.2-billion
ReplyRemove Preview50m
Matt Torkelson We should quit sending equalization payments to Ontaria and we'd be swell.
Manage
Reply45m
Julie Ali $235 million for orphan well loan plus $30 million as free cash. http://www.cbc.ca/.../orphan-wells-notley-announcement...Manage
Image may contain: one or more people, hat, closeup and outdoor
CBC.CA
Alberta offers $235M loan to clean up orphan wells | CBC News
ReplyRemove Preview41m
Julie Ali Matt Torkelson I don't know about that. I think we're getting money back now that we're in deep dish recession which will last in my opinion for the next decade or so. I'm guessing that the subsidy of the industry will also continue. But there you go. Will accept jobs for taxpayer dollars in a so called free market.
Manage
Reply38m
Shane Macallan Julie Ali you are confusing subsidies with cleanup costs, which you are further conflating into one problem by confusing oilsands mining reclamation with conventional oil well reclamation.
For example, the oil and gas industry do not get subsidies, the
y get incentives, which are offered to all companies regardless of their product. Bombardier gets whatever you call that thing. Wind and solar get subsidies, without which they could not exist. As far as reclamation goes, conventional oil has an established fund which is financed by present companies when they enter the market. Since they have a gazillion orphaned wells to reclaim, most of them historic bankruptcies, they have big money problems. On the other hand these problems get constant attention from the media and although it may seem like little progress is made in fact steady regular clean up occurs all the time. Oil sands mining is entirely different, since reclamation is mandatory, by law, and the companies are responsible for their own reclamation. Mining itself occurs only in about 1% of the total oilsands area because the oil is too deep to mine in the rest of the area. The rest extracts oil through processes like in situ SAGD operations which scarcely disturb the surface at all. There is one, and only one, mining op that has entered the public cleanup arena, due to a mine that failed before it even got started, and the conventional cleanup authority says it can handle this particular case without problem.
Manage
Reply31mEdited
Lisa O'Connor Matt Torkelson we are not sending equalization payments to Ontario. You desperately need to understand how Federal tax is collected and dispersed, because comments like these just look ridiculous. It’s all online, directly at the source.
Manage
Reply19m
Lisa O'Connor Shane Macallan there’s also the odd bail out, such as Precision in 09...(330 million fixes a lot of school roofs).
Manage
Reply13m
Julie Ali Shane Macallan Well as far as I am concerned the giving of $30 million is a gift in the orphan well program. That sort of gift was done by the Stelmach as well in a prior bust. Just because other companies get similar "incentives" doesn't seem to make me feel any better about tax dollars used to ensure profits of industry. We have a free market. These companies don't need taxpayer dollars to be competitive. They make profits. So why do we have these "incentives" which appear to be subsidies to me? I'd say to make sure they do make profits which then raises the question what would they be doing without our "incentives" ? Would they be out of business?
Manage
Reply9m
Julie Ali Shane Macallan I think also that the orphan well program liabilities problem have not been resolved and that we will be on the hook as the Redwater decision implies. What is ironic to me is that the AER which is responsible for this mess is now arguing before the Supreme Court that it is not their fault that they set up the system to fail: https://globalnews.ca/.../redwater-ruling-before-supreme.../Manage
Alberta Energy Regulator argues Redwater ruling before the Supreme Court
GLOBALNEWS.CA|BY 630 CHED
Alberta Energy Regulator argues Redwater ruling before the Supreme Court
Like
ReplyRemove Preview2mEdited
Julie Ali Shane Macallan As for the steady clean up story, I beg to differ. If the Auditor General of Alberta has stated that the costs don't match the requirements that's good enough for me that the industry is NOT meeting it's requirements. I also doubt that the industry will reclaim the land it is messing with now because the political parties are pretty much subserviant to the industry as has been proven with the transformation of the NDP into the NDPCs. https://www.oag.ab.ca/.../OAG%20Report%20July%202015.pdf In the event that a mine operator cannot fulfill its reclamation obligations, and no other private operator assumes the liability, the province may have to pay a potentially substantial cost for this work to be completed. Thus, a robust and responsive system to calculate and collect security from mine operators is essential.
Manage
Reply1mEdited
Julie Ali Shane Macallan Also I am not in favor of any industry getting these "incentives". Small business owners have to make do without this sort of taxpayer helps. Why do we to pay for the big business costs?
Manage
Reply1m

No comments:

Post a Comment