Sunday, April 30, 2017

This year, $3.6 million that once paid for school divisions, health-care workers, and social workers to collaborate will be redirected to help fulfil a $50-million provincial government promise to reduce school fees.--At issue is a program called the Regional Collaborative Services Delivery model. Since 2014, it gives school-age children better access to health care and social services workers. It has led to more help in classrooms for visually-impaired and hearing-impaired students, and quicker responses to students with mental-health problems, among other challenges.----------Red Deer Public School Board chairwoman Bev Manning said she’d rather see more money come to the school board with no strings attached, rather than losing money earmarked for students with disabilities, while gaining cash to cover school fees — which are already low in the division. “It’s extremely frustrating to us. These our are most vulnerable students who really need these services,” she said. --“Since Budget 2017 did not include RCSD transition funding, it is the region’s responsibility to plan and adjust service levels to work within a budget that does not include this transitional funding,” she said in an email.---------Julie Ali · University of Alberta I don't understand why an alternative health program gets $14.2 million dollars as was the case with Pure North S'Energy Foundation. We had the hare brained decision by the PCs to provide $10 million upfront to the foundation. Then this was followed by the $4.2 million that the NDP folks gave recently. I am curious why there is so much cash for a foundation that has no proven benefits or deliverables while established educational services for children with disabilities are being cut. Who makes these decisions in government? How are these decisions made? Where is the justification for the waste of cash on Pure North S'Energy Foundation while essential services for children are cut? Like · Reply · Just now Artaxis Lee · Aromatherapy Reflexology Practitioner, Allergy Consultant at ArtaxisLee It doesn't seem to matter what side of the political spectrum they come from, Alberta governments all want to balance their budgets on the backs of the most vulnerable in society. I thought this government might be different, but no such luck. Unlike · Reply · 2 · 4 hrs Julie Ali · University of Alberta You got it. The most vulnerable in education, health, continuing care and child welfare pay while money goes to unproductive projects such as this one: http://www.cbc.ca/.../pure-north-unproven-benefits-1.4053866 Six days before Alberta Health rushed to deliver a $10-million grant to a private alternative-health foundation, the ministry abruptly changed the grant's purpose, eliminating the need for ethics approval for what experts say was a human-subject experiment on thousands of Alberta seniors. On Dec. 23, 2013, former Progressive Conservative health minister Fred Horne approved the funding to Pure North S'Energy Foundation to expand an unproven, alternative "wellness" program, ultimately to more than 7,300 seniors. ** No one at Alberta Health is providing the rationale for this poor decision and no one is explaining why $4.2 million was also added by the NDP folks to this foundation. Meanwhile children with disabilities will suffer as a result of the short sighted decision to reduce funds for them. It's ridiculous. Early support of these children is essential and decreased funding will result in problems downstream that will be more expensive for the system. This decision just does not make sense. Like · Reply · 3 mins · Edited

So I don't understand why the GOA has money for alternative health programs but not for essential supports and services for children with disabilities. Early provision of such supports and services prevents the development of more costly problems later on but we have the folks at Alberta Education simply say that the top up money is gone and the school districts will have to make do. So how will they make do? They will cut staff I guess who help the most vulnerable kids. How on earth does this improve things for the kids and their families?
And yet money is given to the alternative health program without deliverables. Wow. Just wow.
LikeShow more reactions
Comment

So if the funding was due to end and there is still a need why didn't the folks at AB Education simply top up funding for children with disabilities? If the government of Alberta can waste $14.2 million on alternative health programs of the Pure North S'Energy Foundation sort simply for what appears to be political reasons why then can't they top up funds for kids with disabilities?
Why in fact is there no good decision making tree at government so that folks would understand that provision of services and supports early on prevents more expensive support later on in life for these kids?

Students with disabilities and mental-health problems will wait longer for help from a specialist after a planned reduction in funding across the province, say parents and…
CALGARYHERALD.COM

LikeShow more reactions
Comment
Comments



http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/local-news/schools+troubled+decreasing+funds+students+health+needs/13334714/story.html

Schools troubled by decreasing funds for students' health needs

JANET FRENCH, EDMONTON JOURNAL  04.30.2017
Schools troubled by decreasing funds for students' health needs
Jessica Schurman and her eight-year-old daughter, Matea. Matea attends Annie L. Gaetz School in Red Deer. She has autism, and benefits from help from speech language pathologists, psychologists, and occupational therapists.
SUPPLIED / EDMONTON JOURNAL
Students with disabilities and mental-health problems will wait longer for help from a specialist after a planned reduction in funding across the province, say parents and educators.
This year, $3.6 million that once paid for school divisions, health-care workers, and social workers to collaborate will be redirected to help fulfil a $50-million provincial government promise to reduce school fees.
“I would say almost any of the other options would have been better than cutting our most vulnerable students out of the supports that they need,” said Chinook’s Edge School Division superintendent Kurt Sacher. “And it’s not just the most vulnerable students this affects.”
At issue is a program called the Regional Collaborative Services Delivery model. Since 2014, it gives school-age children better access to health care and social services workers.
It has led to more help in classrooms for visually-impaired and hearing-impaired students, and quicker responses to students with mental-health problems, among other challenges.
When the program began, professionals in central Alberta told the government the money being offered to bolster those services wasn’t enough, said Stu Henry, superintendent of Red Deer Public Schools. The government responded by adding three years of “transition funding” that was scheduled to come to an end in 2017.
In the 2017-18 provincial budget, Alberta Education is spending $66.9 million on the services, which is a five per cent drop from last year when nine of the 16 regions still had top-up funds.
The nine school districts in the central Alberta region will receive $1 million less next year, which is about a 16 per cent drop in funding, said Henry. The region will likely lose a speech language assistant, and students and teachers will wait longer for help, training, and professional advice, he said.
Already disadvantaged students will have a harder time catching up to their peers, he said. About 11 per cent of students in the school division have mild to severe disabilities or extra needs.
“I hardly ever criticize the government, their decision making. I think they’ve got a difficult job,” Henry said. “But this one just doesn’t sit well with me. It seems like it’s the wrong group to be cutting from.”
Speech language pathologists, occupational therapists, and psychologists have helped eight-year-old Matea Schurman make great strides in improving her communication skills, said her mother Jessica Schurman. Matea, who is in Grade 2 at Red Deer’s Annie L. Gaetz School, has autism, and didn’t speak at all until about a year ago. She often uses an iPad to communicate during class.
Speech language pathologists are building up Matea’s vocabulary and helping improve her interactions with classmates, Schurman said. Occupational therapists improve her struggles using pens and scissors, and help teachers adapt lessons for her. A psychologist works with her with sensitivity to sounds and crowds, and helps staff understand and cope with her emotional outbursts.
Teachers are already spread so thin, the funding decrease worries Schurman, who calls it “heartbreaking.”
“It’s really, really upsetting, especially when I look at what the provincial government is doing with the free lunch program, free breakfast programs, and $25-a-day daycare,” she said.
She worries if her daughter’s ability to communicate with her classmates begins to deteriorate, the sense of inclusion she feels now will slip away.
Red Deer Public School Board chairwoman Bev Manning said she’d rather see more money come to the school board with no strings attached, rather than losing money earmarked for students with disabilities, while gaining cash to cover school fees — which are already low in the division.
“It’s extremely frustrating to us. These our are most vulnerable students who really need these services,” she said.
With deficit budgets that keep dipping into the division’s dwindling reserves, there’s little money to redirect from other programs to keep health services in tact, she said.
Lindsay Harvey, press secretary to Education Minister David Eggen, said school boards have always known the extra funding would end in 2017.
“Since Budget 2017 did not include RCSD transition funding, it is the region’s responsibility to plan and adjust service levels to work within a budget that does not include this transitional funding,” she said in an email.
“It is important to note that transition funding was provided to these regions to assist with addressing any gaps that the new funding model may have created if implemented without a transition period.”
jfrench@postmedia.com
Twitter.com/jantafrench
Julie Ali ·
I don't understand why an alternative health program gets $14.2 million dollars as was the case with Pure North S'Energy Foundation. We had the hare brained decision by the PCs to provide $10 million upfront to the foundation. Then this was followed by the $4.2 million that the NDP folks gave recently.
I am curious why there is so much cash for a foundation that has no proven benefits or deliverables while established educational services for children with disabilities are being cut.
Who makes these decisions in government? How are these decisions made? Where is the justification for the waste of cash on Pure North S'Energy Foundation while essential services for children are cut?
LikeReplyJust now
Artaxis Lee ·
It doesn't seem to matter what side of the political spectrum they come from, Alberta governments all want to balance their budgets on the backs of the most vulnerable in society. I thought this government might be different, but no such luck.
UnlikeReply24 hrs
Julie Ali ·
You got it. The most vulnerable in education, health, continuing care and child welfare pay while money goes to unproductive projects such as this one:
http://www.cbc.ca/.../pure-north-unproven-benefits-1.4053866

Six days before Alberta Health rushed to deliver a $10-million grant to a private alternative-health foundation, the ministry abruptly changed the grant's purpose, eliminating the need for ethics approval for what experts say was a human-subject experiment on thousands of Alberta seniors.

On Dec. 23, 2013, former Progressive Conservative health minister Fred Horne approved the funding to Pure North S'Energy Foundation to expand an unproven, alternative "wellness" program, ultimately to more than 7,300 seniors.

**
No one at Alberta Health is providing the rationale for this poor decision and no one is explaining why $4.2 million was also added by the NDP folks to this foundation.

Meanwhile children with disabilities will suffer as a result of the short sighted decision to reduce funds for them. It's ridiculous. Early support of these children is essential and decreased funding will result in problems downstream that will be more expensive for the system. This decision just does not make sense.
LikeReply3 minsEdited

No comments:

Post a Comment