Tuesday, April 25, 2017

---“Ontario is a welcoming place,” said Wynne. “The non-resident speculation tax has nothing to do with new Canadians and people who want to make Ontario their home. With the tax, we are targeting people who aren’t looking for a place to raise a family, they are only looking for a quick profit.”-------------Ian Prest less debt than the 71 billion estimate under the dippers Like · Reply · 6 hrs Julie Ali · University of Alberta Ian Prest What difference does this make? Debt is debt. And if you look at the situation in Ontario you can't even buy a home there. At least in Alberta we can put a roof over our heads and take care of ourselves with our own family businesses. I doubt this is as easy to do in Ontario where the cost of housing is ridiculous and it's no better in BC. While the NDP have increased the debt in Alberta--what choice did they had after the failures of the PCs to get the job done of oilsands development in a responsible fashion? We've been left with peanuts in the Heritage Trust Fund, we have an energy regulator we can't sue because the Tories made them immune and unaccountable; we have an orphan well program that is useless that all taxpayers are responsible for (think of the $30 million gifted by the Notley to the oil men) and guess what? We have a major environmental liability that big oil is not going to clean up. The Tories are entirely responsible for these messes. In Alberta, the Tories even had their own personal fund of the Tapcal Fund that is an entirely anti-democratic way of operating in my opinion. Who contributed to this fund? Everyone is mum on this junk. In Ontario there have been both Conservative and Liberal parties that have been incompetent. At least in Alberta the NDP have only been incompetent for two years and we will turf them out to let the Wildrose have a kick at this dented can of a province.

The only time government does anything for us is before an election and the promises don't last beyond being rehired. Ontario is worse than Alberta in its poor governance and voters should hire new folks to government.
LikeShow more reactions
Comment



Ontario slaps 15% tax on foreign buyers, expands rent control in 16-point plan to cool housing

GARRY MARR, FINANCIAL POST  04.20.2017
This is a modal window.

Could not download the video

Error Code: PLAYER_ERR_TIMEOUT
OK
The Ontario government moved forward Thursday with initiatives to rein in the housing market in and around its largest city, announcing 16 new measures including a 15 per cent tax on foreign buyers and expanded rent control rules.
The rent control measures, which apply province-wide, were immediately met with threats from developers to cancel projects in the Greater Toronto Area, an outcome that could ultimately lead to an even tighter market for rental accommodation.
“Our message is this is going to have a devastating effect on purpose-built rental supply,” said Jim Murphy, president of The Federation of Rental Housing Providers of Ontario. “This is coming at a time when we have renewed interest in building rental (properties). We had a 50 per cent increase (in construction) last year.”
One of the changes from the province deals with buildings constructed after 1991, which were previously not covered by rent control rules, allowing landlords to demand any rent they wanted once a lease was up. Anecdotal reports suggested landlords were doubling rents in some cases.
Premier Kathleen Wynne said the Ontario’s Fair Housing Plan had been in the works for weeks after months of consultation.
“The skyrocketing cost of renting or buying in Ontario and the Greater Golden Horseshoe in particular is the unwanted consequence of a strong economy with a promising future,” Wynne said at a press conference at which speculators and landlords were also blamed for rising housing prices and gouging renters. “When young people can’t afford their own apartment or can’t even imagine owning their own home, we know we have a problem.”
The Toronto Real Estate Board said this month that March prices across the region were up 33 per cent from a year ago while condo research firm Urbanation Inc. said condominium rents rose 8.3 per cent in the first quarter from a year ago.


  • The 15 per cent foreign buyers’ tax won’t apply to refugees and immigrant nominees, and a rebate could be available for those who get citizenship later
  • Increase in rents is capped at 2.5 per cent, with some exceptions
  • Government to amend the Residential Tenancies Act to clarify text of leases and compensate evicted tenants
  • Identify surplus provincially owned land that could be used to build affordable housing
  • Tax vacant homes to push owners to sell unoccupied units or rent them out
  • Align property tax for new multi-residential apartment buildings with other residential properties
  • Municipalities could be allowed flexibility to use property tax as a policy tool to influence development


Toronto developer Brad Lamb said the province didn’t do anything to boost supply in the province and vowed to cancel the rental projects that were already in his pipeline.
“Everything is stopping on the dime. I had nine apartment buildings in my pipeline,” said Lamb, describing projects in Toronto’s central core, its suburbs and Hamilton. I can tell you as of this announcement I will not do any of them.”
Wynne was undeterred by arguments from developers. Sources indicate that up until a day ago the province was set to a agree to a deal that would have allowed landlords with post-1991 buildings to pass on annual increases of inflation and up to 1.5 per cent.
“We have all heard the stories of rent gouging going on in today’s market. It’s wrong. And it is not at all fair. The argument that developers need to be able to increase rent by as much as 100 per cent or they won’t keep building rental units, just does not hold water,” the premier said.
The province is trying to appease developers with breaks on property taxes, development fees and promising a better process for cooperation to identify barriers to projects.
“Acknowledging the disincentive that rent controls can cause, Ontario is providing a carrot,” said Craig Alexander, chief economist with the Conference Board of Canada. “The rent controls will stem the rapid rise in rental prices occurring in the market. Only time will tell whether it hampers future rental supply.”
The non-resident speculation tax of 15 per cent which only applies in the Greater Golden Horseshoe was generally welcomed by economists as a small step to control spiralling prices with a general belief that overseas buyers are not as prevalent in Toronto as Vancouver.
“Ontario is a welcoming place,” said Wynne. “The non-resident speculation tax has nothing to do with new Canadians and people who want to make Ontario their home. With the tax, we are targeting people who aren’t looking for a place to raise a family, they are only looking for a quick profit.”
The tax will have exemptions for skilled workers enrolled in provincial programs and refugees. Anyone obtaining a permanent residency or Canadian citizenship within four years of purchasing their home would receive a full rebate of the NRST. International students enrolled full-time for at least two years would receive a full rebate.
Queen’s Park also agreed to a request from Toronto Mayor John Tory to crack down on vacant homes, a perceived problem in the city. Toronto, along with other municipalities, will soon have the power to impose a tax on vacant homes.
“(The measure) will encourage owners to sell or rent their unoccupied units,” said Charles Sousa, the provincial finance minister.
Municipalities will also be allowed to provide a higher tax on service land approved for development, something the government thinks will help spur housing development of vacant lots.
Ontario will also crack down on assignment clauses, the practice which allows a buyer who hasn’t closed a purchase to pass on the right to buy a property. “There are speculators who enter into agreements to purchase property with no intention of buying them or living them, crowding out families who want to buy their own home,” said Sousa.
He believes those “scalpers” are avoiding tax “and should pay their fair share” so the government will now be demanding full disclosure, if a property has been transferred through an assignment clause.
The government wants to make sure the land transfer tax is being paid and plans on working with the Canada Revenue Agency to pass on information it gets from its crackdown on assignment clauses.
Queen’s Park also has plans to review the real estate industry, checking on practices such as double ending where a realtor represents the buyers and the seller. “We’ve heard about fake bidding so we want to modernize the rules,” said Sousa.
Financial Post
gmarr@postmedia.com


Julie Ali ·
I find it curious that the government of Ontario did nothing about the problems of supply until it was time for an election.
My feeling is that this is a non-productive political party and it would just be best to hire new folks to government.
Most government hires do nothing until just before an election when they make promises that aren't kept if they are hired back.
Since this is the case, why not just change the tablecloth of the political party every single election on the fixed table of government?
We're not well serviced by government anywhere in Canada.
In Alberta for example, the waste of cash just on the ABCs (agenices, boards, commissions) as well as the pointless advocate offices with no power (health advocates, seniors advocate, mental health advocate, Ombudsman Office, Protection for Persons in Care Office)--well it's just money down the drain.
Citizens are poorly served by these ABCs and these mostly other appendage offices of Alberta Health.

Since we have no power and no ability to effect change in government other than at election time, I suggest voters swing at every election and not stay loyal to one political brand. After all what did our 44 years of loyalty to the PCs get us? Nothing.
LikeReply10 hrs
Ian Prest
less debt than the 71 billion estimate under the dippers
LikeReply6 hrs
Julie Ali ·
Ian Prest What difference does this make? Debt is debt. And if you look at the situation in Ontario you can't even buy a home there. At least in Alberta we can put a roof over our heads and take care of ourselves with our own family businesses. I doubt this is as easy to do in Ontario where the cost of housing is ridiculous and it's no better in BC.

While the NDP folks have increased the debt in Alberta--what choice did they had after the failures of the PCs to get the job done of oilsands development in a responsible fashion? We've been left with peanuts in the Heritage Trust Fund, we have an energy regulator we can't sue because the Tories made them immune and unaccountable; we have an orphan well program that is useless that all taxpayers are responsible for (think of the $30 million gifted by the Notley to the oil men) and guess what? We have a major environmental liability that big oil is not going to clean up. The Tories are entirely responsible for these messes. In Alberta, the Tories even had their own personal fund of the Tapcal Fund that is an entirely anti-democratic way of operating in my opinion. Who contributed to this fund? Everyone is mum on this junk.

In Ontario there have been both Conservative and Liberal parties that have been incompetent.
At least in Alberta the NDP have only been incompetent for two years and we will turf them out to let the Wildrose have a kick at this dented can of a province.
LikeReplyJust nowEdited


No comments:

Post a Comment